+In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.
Every year on this Sunday our Gospel lesson is taken from the prologue of the Gospel according to John, and we hear the Christmas story from a different perspective–that of cosmic history rather than the particular history recorded in the nativity stories found in Matthew and especially Luke. I loved what our new Presiding Bishop, the Rt. Rev’d Sean Rowe wrote in his Christmas message this year–namely that for him the moment Christmas truly arrives is when he hears those words, “and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us,” again, as indeed we did in the traditional “Last Gospel” Christmas Eve, again the next morning in church on Christmas Day, and yet a third time today for those who attended all three services. It occurs to me that I have preached on this text fifteen years in a row on this Sunday, and though it is among my favorites, I’m going to do something shocking this morning and preach on the Epistle instead. I think you’ll find that it does connect, though, because it explicates what Christ, the Word of God, coming into the world means for us in very practical terms. Namely, so as not to bury the lede, it means that we have obtained freedom in the Gospel, the purpose of the Law of the Old Testament being to prepare us to accept the same.
“The law was our custodian,” Paul wrote to the Galatians, “until Christ came.” The word translated custodian here, or disciplinarian in some other translations, is a bit different and more specific in the Greek. Paul actually says “The law was our paidagogos until Christ came.” A paidagogos was a person with a very important job in the Hellenistic world. He was usually one of the highest ranked and most trusted slaves of the household and he had but one job: convey the children of the household to the gymnasium, the local school, and get them back home again safely at the end of the day. I don’t suspect you see this so much around here (and I know we didn’t when I lived in rural Arkansas), but back when I lived in New York City, there was an equivalent profession- the nanny. Like an uptown Manhattan nanny, the paidagogos had to be trusted a great deal for those parents to turn their kids into his hands. He had to care for the children as if they were his own to execute his job rightly.
So, Paul is saying something like- the Law of the Old Testament was our nanny. The Law got us to school safely and got us back home. The Law kept us from stepping into the oncoming traffic of worldly concerns; it kept us out of the hands of those who would kidnap our hearts and minds, not to get a ransom from wealthy Upper East Side parents, but to pervert our faith and morals, to convince us that the God of Israel is not even our Father after all.
Now, if we were a Jewish synagogue rather than a Christian church, that would be the end of it. But for Paul, and for us, the metaphor must go one step further. We are no longer children. We are expected to approach God as adults, to have a mature relationship with him. Like adult children, we no longer have the threat or the comfort of getting straightened out when our parents get home. “We are no longer under a disciplinarian”, a paidagogos, a nanny. We are expected to live faithfully by our own choice.
Paul was addressing some very specific issues when he made this point. The Church in Galatia was in an uproar as it struggled to determine the requirements of Christianity. There were those who maintained that a gentile, should she or he wish to become a Christian, must first become a Jew. Specifically, for men this meant undergoing the rite of circumcision- less of an issue for an eight-day-old child as for an adult convert as you can imagine. On the other hand, there were those who claimed that Christianity was for all, not only for Jews and those who would become Jews. Believe it or not, this was probably the most controversial issue the church has ever faced. Forget about all of the fights we’ve had about new prayerbooks, and women priests, and human sexuality. Whether or not a gentile could become a Christian without becoming a Jew was far more controversial, and, at least in some sense an even more important question, because it was about the availability of salvation itself to the 99% of the world’s population that wasn’t fortunate enough to be born Jewish.
Paul, as you may be aware, sides with the so-called “uncircumcision party”. He says that you don’t have to become a Jew to become a Christian:
For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ [he writes]. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
For Paul, and for the Church, the Law was certainly God-given, it was certainly good, but it was like one of those nannies, and it took us to school and back home while we were young, but now we’re older and it’s up to us to get on without a nanny. Our parent, God himself, who is the perfect embodiment of fatherhood and motherhood, trusts us to do that. It’s a lot harder than having our hand held by a nanny; it’s a lot harder than knowing all the time exactly what the rules are, exactly what the boundaries are, exactly where all the dangers lie on the road. Even so, God trusts us to take on the challenge.
But, oh how we love rules! Maybe not all of you are preternatural rule-followers, but I know I am. I’m not sure sometimes if I’m a very good Christian, but I believe I’d make an excellent Orthodox Jew. Knowing what is permitted to eat and what not, when and how precisely to pray, being given a specific moral guide in the form of “shalls” and “shall nots”: it would be very comforting to me, and in some sense easier than having my relationship with God predicated on something so vague as faith. This is not to say that following the laws of the Torah was an easy way of life for those who followed it and still do; but for folks so disposed, like I am, to appreciate clear direction, it is at least more straight-forward.
I wonder sometimes whether or not the majority of Christians are still, in a sense, living under the law. While the Old Testament injunctions against pork and the requirement of ritual circumcision and the rest are no longer deemed requirements, many have set up alternative sets of rules. What precisely the rules are is beside the point. The point is that the natural view of religion is that it must have at its heart certain rules which serve as the center of the religion. Whether or not we preach it, it is only natural to see our faith as an exercise in rule-following, to boil Christianity down to the “shalls” and “shall nots” and see them as the central message.
What Paul tells us is that, to the contrary, Christianity is not about rules but about a relationship: a relationship of faith with a God who has literally come down to earth to establish the preconditions that make such a relationship possible. While it is easier to follow rules than to truly trust God, the latter is what it’s all about. What’s more, rules by themselves can breed elitism and contempt. Rules can divide. But a trusting, loving relationship with God is open to all, Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female.
Don’t get me wrong–there are certainly moral and spiritual expectations that could and maybe should be seen as rules. The ten commandments are still important, and Jesus gives us some rules himself: “love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, and soul and your neighbor as yourself” is a pretty good one. But the rules aren’t the center. They all proceed from the relationship of faith and love which we have with God. That relationship is the core. So, for those of us who are rule-followers this might be difficult, but the Good News is that we are now free to build that relationship on terms other than laws. We can build that relationship through our own prayer and discernment, through our own loving relationship with God with the guidance of the Church and the strength given by her Sacraments. Without the nanny holding our hand, we’re now able to enter into our own personal relationship with God (and for that matter, to allow that primary relationship to direct how we relate to each other)- an adult relationship, just as fraught but just as rewarding as an adult child has with a mother or father. There is still trust and support and love. Indeed, these qualities are even richer because they are love and trust and support based on mutuality and respect. So it is when we nurture an adult relationship with our heavenly father. True, the way is beset by dangers, but the kind of relationship we can have is all the better because of this freedom we have in Christ Jesus who came as at this time to dwell among us and promises to enjoy eternity with us in a relationship of perfect love.
+In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.